You are currently browsing the category archive for the 'Books' category.
Every once in a while, I still get a message in my e-mail saying that a member has joined or a member has left, just like I got one this morning. I started the Dostoevsky and Tolstoy Club in the Yahoo! Group many years ago.
I have left the Group as it is for a very long time and has become very inactive in it for many many years and have ignored its messages. However today, out of the blue, or perhaps due to the rain, I decided to go and check the forum out and found that it is full of weed spams, which is very disheartening. It started quite well, with some good discussions, but the spammers! Damn them.
Come to think about it, I still remember how engrossed I was with Dostoevsky when I started reading him many years ago, I think at least about maybe 16 or 18 years ago when I was still in Ipoh. Lacking any formal education in literature and completely oblivious to the riches of the world of literature, save for reading tons of Famous Five and Hardy Boys, I stumbled upon this curious book called CRIME AND PUNISHMENT. Wow! What a title and I thought, well it’s like one of the Hardy Boys adventures perhaps.
And I never turned back and kept on reading and one thing led to another (not like in bed you dirty minded fellow), I discovered one great master after another. I still remember reading ANNA KARENINA for the first time and I remember my dear friend Chyn visited me one day and I told him what a brilliant novel that was! But somehow, Dostoevsky is still nearer to my heart than Tolstoy. I think I have read most of Dostoevsky’s published works that are available in English and mass-marketed.
The reason I like Dostoevsky so much, I think, is because of his depiction of the human condition, his insight into the human psyche and digging into them warts and all and often comes out to be able to inspire a tinge of hope in mankind despite all the evil and bad that mankind is capable of.
Looking back, I think I have not read a Dostoevsky for a very long time and of course, I have been reading quite a lot of other authors like Hemingway, Chekhov, Mo Yan, Murakami, Marquez and a bunch of others which I also really enjoy, and recently I have read some Orhan Pamuk and thought that he is one hell of a writer too and look forward to read his new novel, THE MUSEUM OF INNOCENCE which is now out in the market on paperback.
The best thing of all this reading is that one realizes that there is still a whole lot of good books out there waiting to be read, and that one has the leisure to slowly discover them and enjoy them gives one an enormous feeling of satisfaction, of hope and above all, the realization of the richness and diversity of the world and all the exploration that is possible. Isn’t this such a nice feeling? That something out there is waiting for you to be discovered and savored?
As per my earlier post, I said that I will post about Godard’s PIERROT LE FOU and I will. However, as anyone who has some idea of Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s (or better known as Gabo) work, will notice from the title of this post that I am about to write something about his CHRONICLE OF A DEATH FORETOLD.
It is a short novel about the death of a guy who is foretold, i.e. the whole town knows that he is going to be killed, when and where he is going to be killed and why he is to be killed. However, somehow, no one does anything about it and he indeed was killed in a most gruesome way, without a clue himself why he has to suffer such a fate. In fact, it is almost bewildering why it is that the whole town knows that he is going to die but this news seem to escape him.
The reason for his murder is simple; the twin brother of a girl wants to redeem the family and their sister’s honour because the sister was returned home by her new husband because he found out the night itself that she is not a virgin. The girl was beaten and asked to confess who is the guy who stained her and she named the unfortunate guy. However, no one really believes that he is the guy, which is probably one reason why the guy has a puzzled look when his killers went after him. Who is the real guy who took her virginity? Well, it was left silent in the novel.
In the midst of this storytelling, there are many things that Gabo did that made the story click and enjoyable to read, the details and the occasional mystery and magic that he pumped in. All in all, this is a superb novel and anyone who wishes to have something enjoyable to read over a weekend can pick this book up.
Now about PIERROT LE FOU. Godard. Jean-Luc Godard. What a director he is. This movie was released in 1965, hot in the midst of the French New Wave. This movie reminds me of many movies, although it is of itself very unique. It reminds me, most of all, of BREATHLESS and of BONNIE AND CLYDE. It won’t be a wonder if it actually had some influence on BONNIE AND CLYDE which was released two years after this movie. In those years, movies influence each other as it is apparent that Hollywood movie influenced European movies a whole lot, and in fact inspired the European filmmakers a big deal. It is no surprise to see many Hollywood references in European movies and if one has seen THE DREAMERS, one will also have an appreciation on the fireworks that Hollywood had on European, particularly French cinema.
If anything, PIERROT LE FOU is made such a good movie by its actors, both Jean-Paul Belmondo whose excellent performance we have also seen in BREATHLESS and Anna Karina whom we have seen in many movies, especially BAND OF OUTSIDERS and MY LIFE TO LIVE, one of my favourite Godard movies.
PIERROT LE FOU is about a guy and his so-called girlfriend, who is quite sick of a boring life and seeks adventure. They are free spirits and could not stand Jules Vernes for long and had to go for a gangster movie once in a while. The ending is tragic but is befitting. The film techniques is, ermmm, technical, employing strong primary colours, uses of cuts, repetitive dialogue, looking at the camera and talking to the audience (not as subtle as the final scene in Truffaut’s 400 BLOWS but is also very effective), etc. On the latter, i.e. looking at the audience, it is somehow effective, for example, in a scene, Belmondo is looking at the camera and talking and Karina asked him what he is doing and the effect is that they are conscious of an audience watching them and the audience is made conscious that the actors on the screen knows that someone is watching them and listening to what they are saying. This is especially so when they are on the run from the law.
PIERROT LE FOU is really a celebration of cinema. One feels happy after watching the movie, and as Gabo felt after reading Kafka’s THE METAMORPHOSIS where he suddenly realized that novels can be written in that way, after watching PIERROT LE FOU, one also realizes that “oh, movies can also be made like this”.
A gem and masterpiece indeed.
Perhaps it is true that I am blogging too much about Go, which of course is not a bad thing, but the fact is that for a Jack of All Trades like myself, there are other things that is happening that I would also like to talk about or update. My geeky friend (as I have called her since the first time I wrote on this blog) who is now in Hong Kong already complained that this blog of mine is becoming a blog exclusively about Go! Where did all the movies go? That is true.
Anyways, for a fact, I have not spent time exclusively on Go, which explains why I am still so bad at that game. Perhaps a short update on recent activities is due?
Non-Go related book that I am currently reading:
Gabriel Garcia Marquez: A Life by Gerald Martin.
I have been quite a fan of Gabo (as he is affectionately called) and I wonder who wouldn’t if they have spent some time reading such works as ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SOLITUDE and LOVE IN THE TIME OF CHOLERA.
On his last visit to Malaysia, my dear friend Dr. Sudah whom I refer to as the Sexy Doctor or the Mahler lookalike (here is his blog:The Physician Anthropologist), was reading the aforesaid book and I was intrigued. Luckily I found the book in MPH which was a surprise after looking high and low in Kinokuniya and Borders to no avail.
Gabo’s story is very inspiring, a rags to riches story and I am currently at almost half of the book and is enjoying it very much. The opening chapter on the family genealogy can be quite confusing but should not be something that anyone who has read ONE HUNDRED YEARS OF SOLITUDE cannot handle. After the opening chapter, the rest is a breeze and an enjoyable read. At a certain point, I thought I really wanted to be an author like Gabo too.
Movies Watched:
Hayao Miyazaki’s PONYO ON THE CLIFF. Oh my goodness. I have been wanting to watch this for the longest time but alas! it was not shown in Malaysian cinemas. I managed to get a 2-DVD set while in Korea and have watched it. What an amazing piece of art this is. Ponyo is just so cute and adorable, the soundtrack is superb as usual and it is very uplifting. Both my wife and myself felt so much happier after watching this movie.
INGLORIOUS BASTERDS. I have also been waiting for this for the longest time and it did not disappoint. Typical Quentin Tarantino extravaganza of unforgettable scenes and dialog. I was quite worried about Brad Pitt before the movie but after watching it, I felt he is perfect for the role.
POKER KING. Despite being a fan of Texas Hold’em, I do not find this movie to be really good and I felt that the twist at the end of the movie rather lame. However, this is an enjoyable movie and quite entertaining. I like Wong You-nam very much in the movie. I cannot but compare it to ROUNDERS and I find ROUNDERS a better movie, although perhaps on the enjoyment level, POKER KING is at least at par. After the movie, I chatted with my geeky friend over the phone and she highlighted to me the subtleties in the movie, on the state of affairs in Macau and how the industry is wrecking havoc on the economy and such. Anyways, lovers of Hong Kong movie should not miss this movie though.
Well, that’s a few things that I am doing or have just recently done this week that is not Go related.
I am planning to start reading a novel but I can’t decide which one to read. Hmmmm……
Once in a while, a really good book will appear. In Go, the book that I am talking about now is KAMAKURA by John Fairbairn. The book is about the 10 Game (Jubango) between the two legendary Go players of our time, Kitani Minoru (featured in Kawabata’s novel “The Master of Go”) and Go Seigen (featured in Tian Zhuangzhuang’s film “The Go Master”). This jubango at Kamakura is also a legendary event. Besides the historical and cultural significance that it implies, it is also a contest between two of the top players in the world (at that time) and between two good friends.
The book by John Fairbairn not only gave a superb introduction to each of the players as well as a superb write up to the events and history leading to the Kamakura games (trust me, it is really excellent), what he did in the game commentary is simply amazing. We have all read and seen game commentaries where good moves and alternative moves etc. are discussed, with various diagrams. What John added was not only the surrounding background and sometimes the time the players took to think (so that we know that a move was thought over by a player for 30 minutes, for example), he also recorded the conversation between Go Seigen and Kitani. You you actually know what they are thinking and talking to each other.
This is just like our normal games that we play with friends, i.e. we play a move and then chat about it. Despite the enormous impact of the Kamakura games, the two players still chat like friends, talking about the game openly while the game is in progress, revealing their thoughts and strategy, not after the game ended! This shows how great these two guys really are.
I strongly recommend this book to anyone interested in Go Seigen and Kitani, especially so the historical background in the their times leading to and including the Kamakura games. Also of course, you will learn about the games, get an in-depth look at the moves, sometimes blow-by-blow. But above all, it is a story about these two go geniuses.
However, if you are just interested purely in go techniques, new openings, new josekis, etc. the Korean books such as “21st Century New Openings” by Kim Sung-Rae will be very much suitable and good.
For me, I think I can read Kamakura over and over again but I still have trouble getting through the first 20 pages of Kim Sung-Rae’s book. That probably explains why I am still so weak at go ;-)
Please accept my highest recommendation for KAMAKURA by John Fairbairn. It will be a classic in the league of John Power’s INVINCIBLE, the games of Shusaku.
A post on movies is due and I would like to write about the current movie that is playing in the cinemas right now. The title of the movie is called SELL OUT!. I would also like to write about TALENTIME and other recently released Malaysian (or Malay) movie and write and update on the current state of the film industry, both in Malaysia as well as in the world, just like I used to do last time (check out the “Notes” section at the top of this page).
Anyways, as far as I would like to write about them, I feel inadequately prepared and not knowledgeable enough of the industry that I have left for almost 10 months now, even if I am still very much in love with the industry. Anyways, I will write about SELL OUT! in the next post since it is like a phenomena in the local movie scene.
For this post, just as an apetiser, I would just like to talk about short stories, particularly one that I read recently and if you fancy and if you have not read it or known this writer, you may like to check his books out in the local bookstore.
The guy’s name is Raymond Carver and he is such a good short-story writer. I actually know him through Haruki Murakami who is a huge fan of his and in the beginning, I tried to read some of Carver’s work but it didn’t move me even a little. I felt nothing at that moment.
Anyways, time passed and recently I took the fancy of reading one of his work again but this time it somehow clicked and I begin to read one of his short stories after another. Carver’s world begin to form in my mind and I felt I begin to appreciate him.
For a fact, the story that made it click for me was THE STUDENT’S WIFE. Then came WHY DON’T YOU DANCE? And it went on and on. His stories are very mundane, day-to-day, everyday life stories about common people. About their life, about their feelings, about their fears, about things they love, etc. Real simple stories, no bambastic princes and knights, etc. The way he told it is very subtle, not in your face and his style flows very naturally and is unpretentious.
So, story after story, I really enjoy rading Carver now and am so very afraid that one day, I would have read everything he wrote and then what?
It is time now to put away all other weiqi/go books and study this book and do all the questions in it with 1,000 times intensity. Hopefully at the end of this, I will understand this more and stop doing really silly mistakes for the rest of my games.
This is one of the best books that emerged from this series and when I first got this book in 2004, I really didn’t appreciate it. At that time, I was only a lowly Kyu player and a lot of what is in the book is beyond me at that time. Now, revisiting it, I found it to be such a huge treasure trove.
Was waiting for so long for this book and it is finally here today! Yay!
Added to the site, commentary on Zhang Yuan’s SEVENTEEN YEARS. One of the best movies from one of the leading “6th Generation” Chinese filmmakers. Read it here: http://hdoong.googlepages.com/
With the invasion of Facebook in my life (and countless other lives), I tend to spend a rather large percentage of my private online time on it and catching up with friends. I also seem to be writing there, using the Notes function, which saw me writing 2 notes which should have belonged to this blog! Anyways, I will still write on this blog, no less but for those readers here who are also on Facebook, let’s be friends there :)
Okay, maybe before I go to the meat of this post, a couple of things that got me hooked during October (besides others – e.g. poker and I am now loving Omaha Hi/Lo!):
Movies: Have been watching Tarkovsky’s STALKER again and again and still marvelling! Absolutely great movie.
Books: THE KITE RUNNER by Khaled Hosseini. Great story of friendship and redemption as happened in the land of Afghanistan, spanning 2 decades and thus also revealing Afghanistan’s terrible fate in during those years.
Okay, now I am tagged by my great friend YTSL in her blog and here it is. I love here memes which always get me thinking ;-)
Four childhood books
I don’t read a lot during my childhood. I only really started reading when I am about 13 years old and it was then that I started to read the Enid Blytons, even a couple of Nancy Drews. However, I distinctly remember being read a book when I was a kid and that was the “3 Character Classic” – yes, that Confusian-Mencian tradition one.
I also remember flipping through some Children’s Encyclopedia books but no memories really came from that except that the idea of the existence of the Universe really stuck and I can still remember this Copernican revolution for my small mind that time.
I really don’t remember reading much during my childhood days. But I do play a lot, hang out in the streets a lot and do all sorts of naughty stuffs – and get spanked real hard by my mom and I had to hide underneath my grandma’s chair.
Four authors I will read again and again
1. Lin Yutang
2. Rabindranath Tagore
3. Ralph Waldo Emerson
4. Haruki Murakami
Four authors I will never read again
Because I read by way of recommendation and don’t really plunge in reading books by people I have never heard of, but here are some author’s whose works I will never read again, not at least for now!
1. Hegel – Heaven! What???? Read this: “The bond of duty can appear as a restriction only on indeterminate subjectivity or abstract freedom, and on the impulses either of the natural will or of the moral will which determines its indeterminate good arbitrarily.”
2. Anything by, or associated with, Donald Trump. I just cannot stand seeing that guy’s face.
3. Adeline Yen Mah – when I read Falling Leaves, I got sucked in only to realise that I got tricked with false sympathy. Hate being taken for a ride.
The first four books on my to-be-read list
1. A Thousand Splendid Suns – Khaled Hosseini
2. The Complete Works of Anton Chekhov
3. Gustav Mahler: Volume 4 A New Life Cut Short 1907-1911 – Henri Louis de la Grange
The four books I would take to a desert island
1. The Importance of Living – Lin Yutang
2. Ralph Waldo Emerson – Essays and Journals
3. The Dhammapada
4. The Old Man and The Sea – hahahaha!
The last lines of one of my favourite books.
“And how long do you think we can keep up this goddamn coming and going?” he asked.
Florentino Ariza had kept his answer ready for fifty-three years, seven months, and eleven days and night.
“Forever,” he said.
-Love in the Time of Cholera – Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Now don’t blame me for this for I am a sucker for romantic stories :)
As I was reading and thinking of the discourses of the Buddha in the book I am reading now, In the Buddha’s Words: An Anthology of Discourses from the Pali Canon, many passages made a very strong impression and got me thinking real deep and hard at the root. It helped me straighten my mind and helped me acquire some insights into my own thoughts and being as well as cut through the hustle and bustle of the happenings of the daily life.
Buddhism has this effect on me and I have never see Buddhism as a religion but a very powerful philosophical system rooted on logic, common sense and the betterment of the human condition.
Here is to share some words from the Samyutta Nikaya, titled “The Hindrances to Mental Development”:
According to this sutta, there are 5 hindrances to mental development, namely:
1. Sensual lust
2. Ill will
3. Dullness and drowsiness
4. Restlessless and remorse
5. Doubt
If we look deep into each one of the above, meditating on them (the Buddha has advised a very powerful yet simple method of meditation based on breathing), we can really see that these 5 sometimes really paralyzes our thoughts, poisons our mind and blocking us from achieving a better mental state.
For example, when we have ill will towards a certain people, our whole mind is coloured as such and we could not be objective and think straight. It also hurts our emotional self and much more. One of the ways to counter this is to inculcate a spirit of loving-kindness towards all being. Also, if we are dull and lazy and always drowsy and intoxicated, there is no way we can think straight and have a productive life. If we are indulgent to sensual lust, we are bound to be tempted into many things that has a negative effect on not only our mind but spirit, body, family etc.
The discourse on this is comprehensive and comes along with similes using a pot of water as a reflection of our mind and after reading this sutta, I started to think deep and many a knot has been untangled.
Just got this book from FINAS today: Malaysian films :the beginning /by Mohd. Zamberi A. Malek, Aimi Jarr.. Read 3 quarters of it now and didn’t like it. The writing is too superficial, the illustrations doesn’t match the text and all throughout the book… “Producers commercially driven with little regard for Malay culture” and variants of it all throughout the book. Sickening propaganda book.
“It was even said that the sophisticated studios of Shaw Brothers, the largest in Hong Kong and a paragon of Chinese culture and civilization, was built on profits derived from the blood, sweat and tears of the actors and those involved in film-making in Jalan Ampas…. A celebrated local film personality implied that the success of the Jalan Ampas studio owed much to the local actors because the management and technicians were Chinese who hardly knew the Malay language, while the directors were Indians and Filipinos who were ignorant of local customs and traditions…”
I don’t know what’s wrong with these guys. Such inferiority complex, yes? What about a keen sense of business acumen, superb storytelling techniques, talent management and development, etc? Exactly what the current local film industry is lacking, for example??
While doing an occasional clean-up of my bookshelf, this book suddenly appeared from nowhere and reminded me how much pleasure I had from it. Very nice stories. Mo Yan is a very good storyteller.
Shifu, You’ll Do Anything for a Laugh
I have read many business books and I enjoy reading them a lot. I consider the following three of the best I have read:
Yeah…. finally a film guide that makes a bit of sense. Two more copies available at Borders in Berjaya Times Square. I do recommend this book above others, including, yes, The Great Movies series by Roger Ebert and definitely above the The A List: The National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films. Anyone who wants to be “educated” in movies, to speak bombastically, should watch every one of the movies recommended in this book, and that includes me since there are many in this book that I have not watched but “knows” that they are great movies, and from the selection pattern/decision, I project that the other movies recommended are good as well. At least it will give one a rather well rounded appreciation of world cinema compared to others that I have read.
Just take a look at the table of contents:
Table of Contents
Contributors.
L’Age d’Or (Luis Buñuel, 1930).
The Age of Innocence (Martin Scorsese, 1993).
Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (Rainer Werner Fassbinder, 1974).
Andrei Rublev (Andrei Tartovsky, 1969).
The Apu Trilogy (Satyajit Ray): Pather Panchali (1955), Aparajito (1957), The World of Apu (1959).
L’Argent (Robert Bresson, 1983).
L’Atalante (Jean Vigo, 1934).
Au Hasard Balthazar (Robert Bresson, 1966).
L’Avventura (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1960).
Bad Lieutenant (Abel Ferrara, 1992).
Barry Lyndon (Stanley Kubrick, 1975).
The Battle of Algiers (Gillo Pontecorvo, 1965).
Beau Travail (Claire Denis, 1999).
Before Sunset (Richard Linklater, 2004).
Belle de Jour (Luis Buñuel, 1967).
The Bicycle Thief (Vittorio de Sica, 1948).
The Birds (Alfred Hitchcock, 1963).
Blow-Up (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1966).
Blue Velvet (David Lynch, 1986).
Breathless (Jean-Luc Godard, 1960).
Café Lumière (Hou Hsiao-hsien, 2003).
Ceddo (Ousmane Sembene, 1977).
Céline and Julie Go Boating (Jacques Rivette, 1974).
The Chelsea Girls (Andy Worhol, 1966).
Chinatown (Roman Polanski, 1974).
Chungking Express (Wong Kar-wai, 1994).
Citizen Kane (Orson Welles, 1941).
Close-Up (Abbas Kiarostami, 1990).
The Color of Pomegranates (Sergei Paradjanov, 1968).
The Conformist (Bernardo Bertolucci, 1970).
Contempt (Jean-Luc Godard, 1963).
Cutter and Bone/Cutter’s Way (Ivan Passer, 1981).
Days of Being Wild (Wong Kar-wai, 1991).
Dead Man (Jim Jarmusch, 1995).
Dead Ringers (David Cronenberg, 1988).
The Decalogue (Krzysztof Kieslowski, 1989).
The Devil, Probably (Robert Bresson, 1977).
Distant Voices, Still Lives (Terence Davies, 1988).
Do the Right Thing (Spike Lee, 1989).
Dogville (Lars von Trier, 2003).
Donnie Darko (Richard Kelly, 2001).
Earth (Aleksandr Dovzhenko, 1930).
Eraserhead (David Lynch, 1977).
The Evil Dead (Sam Raimi, 1981).
F for Fake (Orson Welles, 1974).
Faces (John Cassavetes, 1968).
Fight Club (David Fincher, 1999).
Flaming Creatures (Jack Smith, 1963).
The Flower Thief (Ron Rice, 1960).
Flowing/Late Chrysanthemums (Mikio Naruse, 1956/1954).
Gertrud (Carl Theodor Dreyer, 1964).
Glen or Glenda? (Edward D. Wood, 1953).
Gun Crazy (Joseph H. Lewis, 1949).
Halloween (John Carpenter, 1978).
The Heart of the World (Guy Maddin, 2000).
A History of Violence (David Cronenberg, 2005).
Horse Thief (Tian Zhuangzhuang, 1986).
The House Is Black (Forugh Farrokhzad, 1963).
I e Huckabees (David O. Russell, 2004).
Johnny Guitar (Nicholas Ray, 1954).
The King of Comedy (Martin Scorsese, 1983).
Kiss Me Deadly (Robert Aldrich, 1955).
Landscape in the Mist (Theo Angelopoulos, 1988).
Love Streams (John Cassavetes, 1984).
The Lovers on the Bridge (Leos Carax, 1991).
M (Fritz Lang, 1931).
The Magnificent Ambersons (Orson Welles, 1942).
The Man with a Movie Camera (Dziga Vertov, 1929).
McCabe and Mrs. Miller (Robert Altman, 1971).
The Merchant of Four Seasons (Rainer Werner Fassbinder, 1972).
Mulholland Drive (David Lynch, 2001).
Naked (Mike Leigh, 1993).
Night and Fog in Japan (Nagisa Oshima, 1960).
Night of the Living Dead (George A. Romero, 1968).
Los Olvidados (Luis Buñuel, 1950).
Once upon a Time in the West (Sergio Leone, 1968).
Out of the Past (Jacques Tourneur, 1947).
Peking Opera Blues (Tsui Hark, 1986).
Persona (Ingmar Bergman, 1966).
Pickpocket (Robert Bresson, 1959).
Pierrot le Fou (Jean-Luc Godard, 1965).
Pink Flamingos (John Waters, 1972).
Platform (Jia Zhangke, 2000).
Playtime (Jacques Tati, 1967).
The Portrait of a Lady (Jane Campion, 1996).
The Power of Kwangwon Province (Hong Sang-soo, 1998).
Primer (Shane Carruth, 2004).
Psycho (Alfred Hitchcock, 1960).
Pulp Fiction (Quentin Tarantino, 1994).
Punishment Park (Peter Watkins, 1971).
The Puppet Master (Hou Hsiao-hsien, 1993).
Real Life (Albert Brooks, 1979).
Rear Window (Alfred Hitchcock, 1954).
Reds (Warren Beatty, 1981).
Safe (Todd Haynes, 1995).
Salesman (Albert Maysles, 1969).
Sans Soleil (Chris Marker , 1983).
Sansho the Bailiff (Kenji Mizoguchi, 1954).
Sátántangó (Béla Tarr, 1994).
Scenes from under Childhood Section 1-4 (Stan Brakhage, 1970).
The Searchers (John Ford, 1956).
Shadows (John Cassavetes, 1958/1959).
Sunrise (F.W. Murnau, 1927).
Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story (Todd Haynes, 1987).
Taxi Driver (Martin Scorsese, 1976).
That Obscure Object of Desire (Luis Buñuel, 1977).
There’s Something about Mary (Peter Farrelly and Bobby Farrelly, 1998).
The Thin Blue Line (Errol Morris, 1988).
The Thin Red Line (Terrence Mallick, 1998).
El Topo (Alejandro Jodorowsky, 1970).
Tribulation 99: Alien Anomalies under America (Craig Baldwin, 1992).
Tropical Malady (Apichatpong Weerasethakul, 2004).
Trouble in Paradise (Ernst Lubitsch, 1932).
Two or Three Things I Know about Her (Jean-Luc Godard, 1967).
2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968).
Unforgiven (Clint Eastwood, 1992).
Les Vampires (Louis Feuillade, 1915).
Vengeance is Mine (Shohei Imamura, 1979).
Vertigo (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958).
Videodrome (David Cronenberg, 1983).
Zero for Conduct (Jean Vigo, 1933).
Index.
Ah, nice to hear Mr. Murakami winning the Franz Kafka Prize recently. In fact, I am currently engrossed with his “Blind Willow, Sleeping Woman” which I bought in Hyderabad but have not really gotten time to read it until recently. Strongly recommend this to anyone who enjoys some good short stories.
By the way, here’s a music video and shows you exactly how it looks like when accountants try to be hip. Hehehe.
(Thanks to Grady for pointing this out)
What Am I Reading Now?
December 18, 2006 in Books, Philosophy, Thoughts & Commentaries | Leave a comment
I have long found Communism fascinating (after reading the “Manifesto of The Communist Party” in volume 50 of the Great Books of the Western World series but could never really get past Part 1 of “Capital” and had to rely on secondary sources…sigh… such weakness), not all the cruelties that seem to be part of that system, but Marx’s philosophical foundation of communism. According to the Concise Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy (which is not really very good compared to say The Oxford Companion to Philosophy but alas! I have the Routledge in my library but not the Oxford):
“Communism is the belief that society should be organized without private property, all productive property being held communally, publicly or in common. A communist system is one based on a community of goods. It is generally presented as a positive alternative to competition, a system that is thought to divide people: communism is expected to draw people together and to create a community. In most cases, the arguments for communism advocate replacing competition with cooperaton either for its own sake or to promote a goal such as equality, or to free specific groups of people to serve a higher ideal such as the state or God.”
Isn’t this a wonderful idea? In fact, if we look at it, what is currently happening in the world inspired by open source software and blogs and communities such as MySpace is exactly what communism is about and see how far they have gone and how they have beaten capitalists (read for example, Microsoft) so convincingly?
The sad thing is communism is too great a political system for human beings because human beings are still, no matter how you want to argue it, base and vulgar, selfish and ignorant. In fact, communism as Marx has conceived it, is a system for an advanced society. But somehow, it appealed to a society that is far from being advanced but dominated by selfish people controlling the mass of poor peasants and exploited workers who are willing to give it a shot since there is nothing to lose anyways. However, as Eric Arthur Blair (a.k.a. George Orwell) said beautifully, “All animals are equal but some are more equal than others”. Until all animals are really equal, communism will not work as a political system.